<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Goes Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stepheno.net/2006/12/12/new-york-times-goes-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/12/new-york-times-goes-social/</link>
	<description>Captivating communication confusion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 16:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen olsen</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/12/new-york-times-goes-social/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2006/12/12/new-york-times-goes-social/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I was surprised seeing some of the negative commentaries about the NYT&#039;s decission on various other blogs. 
Giving the audience a voice, as you pointed out, is a very good way of putting it. It gives the opportunity for users to share what could be vital information. Moving away from the regular one-way communication form, which is usual in newspapers, to a more two-way communication, will hopefully, overlooking the unpresent critisism, give a more correct picture/reflection of society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was surprised seeing some of the negative commentaries about the NYT&#8217;s decission on various other blogs.<br />
Giving the audience a voice, as you pointed out, is a very good way of putting it. It gives the opportunity for users to share what could be vital information. Moving away from the regular one-way communication form, which is usual in newspapers, to a more two-way communication, will hopefully, overlooking the unpresent critisism, give a more correct picture/reflection of society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Smallman</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/12/new-york-times-goes-social/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Smallman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2006/12/12/new-york-times-goes-social/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s going to be a lot more of this kind of thing.

To me, this is an inevitability rather than some admission of defeat (depending on what commentary you choose read.)

Fostering a community around new coverage, giving your audience a voice is a glimpse of things to come...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s going to be a lot more of this kind of thing.</p>
<p>To me, this is an inevitability rather than some admission of defeat (depending on what commentary you choose read.)</p>
<p>Fostering a community around new coverage, giving your audience a voice is a glimpse of things to come&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

