<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>stepheno.net &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stepheno.net/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stepheno.net</link>
	<description>Captivating communication confusion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Buddi Budgeting Offline</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/04/09/buddi-budgeting-offline/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/04/09/buddi-budgeting-offline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/04/09/buddi-budgeting-offline/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buddi is apparently a very easy and basic application approach for simple budgeting. Although an offline application, it&#8217;s available for Windows, Linux and Mac. I was looking forward to try it out on my iBook, but since I would have to install Java 1.5 on an already dangerously low free disk space level, I aborted. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://buddi.sourceforge.net/" title="Sourceforge: Buddi">Buddi</a> is apparently a very easy and basic application approach for simple budgeting. Although an offline application, it&#8217;s available for Windows, Linux and Mac. I was looking forward to try it out on my iBook, but since I would have to install Java 1.5 on an already dangerously low free disk space level, I aborted. Instead check out <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com/software/personal-finance/screenshot-tour-manage-your-money-for-free-with-buddi-249752.php" title="LifeHacker: Budgeting w/Buddi">LifeHacker&#8217;s review</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/04/buddifinance.jpg" alt="Buddi Screenshot Copied from buddi.sourceforge.net" /></p>
<p>(Now when I can afford it, I&#8217;m thinking of a USB stick with applications?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/04/09/buddi-budgeting-offline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Among Best Tech Products of All Time</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/04/03/among-best-tech-products-of-all-time/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/04/03/among-best-tech-products-of-all-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/04/03/among-best-tech-products-of-all-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PC World has just rated 50 of the Best Tech Products of All Time. Being the Apple Macintosh enthusiast as I am, I enjoyed seeing Apple ranked second only following Netscape Navigator, as well as several other Apple related placements further down. I&#8217;ll let you check out the complete list. But I also want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PC World has just rated <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130207-page,1-c,technology/article.html" title="PCWorld: 50 Best Tech Products of All Time">50 of the Best Tech Products of All Time</a>. Being the Apple Macintosh enthusiast as I am, I enjoyed seeing Apple ranked second only following Netscape Navigator, as well as several other Apple related placements further down. I&#8217;ll let you check out the complete list.</p>
<p><img src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/04/pcworldtop50.jpg" alt="Screenshot PCWorld 50 Best Tech Productsâ€¦" /></p>
<p>But I also want to point out some of my personal favorites: Atari 2600, Eudora and HyperCard to mention a few.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/03/0225236&amp;from=rss" title="Slashdot: PC World 50 best...">Slashdot</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/04/03/among-best-tech-products-of-all-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Apple Trademark War</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/01/11/cisco-apple-trademark-war/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/01/11/cisco-apple-trademark-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/01/11/cisco-apple-trademark-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first shots were fired yesterday (Wednesday Jan. 10th 2007) after peace talk negotiations for the last five years failed. This came as a shock to the apparent peaceful response from Cisco that I briefly mentioned at the end of Apple iPhone-d Us After Allâ€¦ . I went to bed yesterday, with a peace of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first shots were fired yesterday (Wednesday Jan. 10th 2007) after peace talk negotiations for the last five years failed. This came as a shock to the apparent peaceful response from Cisco that I briefly mentioned at the end of <a title="Apple iPhone-d Us After All..." href="http://stepheno.net/2007/01/10/apple-iphone-d-us-after-all%e2%80%a6/">Apple iPhone-d Us After Allâ€¦</a> .<br />
I went to bed yesterday, with a peace of mind that the war was avoided. Then I was rudely awoken to the news that Cisco had filed a trademark infringement lawsuit.</p>
<p><img id="image110" alt="iPhone Apple Cisco Trademark War" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/01/iphonewar.jpg" /></p>
<p>Ciscoâ€™s Strategy: Attack when you are least expecting it. I donâ€™t think itâ€™s a coincidence that Apple enthusiasts were emotionally high and overjoyed by the good news about the iPhone. Then Cisco pulled away the very ground they were standing on, the fact that the so endeared name will cause controversy into the finite future.</p>
<p><a title="Wikipedia: Apple Inc." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer">Apple Inc.</a> (formerly Apple Computers Inc. until Tuesday) has been fighting the trademark war with <a title="Wikipedia: Apple Corp Ltd." href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Corps">Apple Corps Ltd.</a> for years, with substantial monetary losses on both sides of the gunfire.</p>
<p><a title="NYTimes: Cisco, Claiming Ownership of â€˜iPhone,â€™ Sues Apple" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/11/technology/11apple.html?ex=157680000&#038;en=da3057101f6f875b&#038;ei=5124&#038;partner=permalink&#038;exprod=permalink">New York Times</a> covered the story more detailed also interviewing Appleâ€™s vice president for worldwide communications, Katie Cotton and Mark Chandler, Ciscoâ€™s general counsel. <a title="Yahoo: Cisco sues Apple over use of iPhone name" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070110/ap_on_hi_te/cisco_apple">Yahoo!</a> also has some good coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/01/11/cisco-apple-trademark-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple iPhone-d Us After All…</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/01/10/apple-iphone-d-us-after-all%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/01/10/apple-iphone-d-us-after-all%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/01/10/apple-iphone-d-us-after-all%e2%80%a6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The greatest surprise to me, they even called it iPhone, though I have yet to see it officially without the Apple logo in front. How does this affect all the trademarks that LinkSys/Cisco acquired? (Hoping Apple Doesnâ€™t iPhone  and  iPhone is Not Appleâ€™s iPhone)   So it looks really, cool, and I actually do think, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greatest surprise to me, they even called it <a title="Apple.com: iPhone" href="http://www.apple.com/iphone">iPhone</a>, though I have yet to see it officially without the Apple logo in front. How does this affect all the trademarks that LinkSys/Cisco acquired? (<a title="Hopeing Apple Doesn't iPhone..." href="http://stepheno.net/2006/12/08/i-hope-apple-doesnt-iphone/">Hoping Apple Doesnâ€™t iPhone</a>  and  <a title="iPhone is Not Apple's iPhone" href="http://stepheno.net/2006/12/18/iphone-is-not-apples-iphone/">iPhone is Not Appleâ€™s iPhone</a>)</p>
<p><img id="image100" alt="Screenshot Apple's REAL iPhone" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/01/aiphone.jpg" /> <br />
So it looks really, cool, and I actually do think, that the shear â€œcoolnessâ€ factor will sell some iPhones, but at the same time it looks too fragile. I expect to see people scratching up half the screen the first time that slim Apple iPhone body slips out their hands.</p>
<p>On the other hand I donâ€™t think your nor I, would mind giving the iPhone a test drive. (Rumors have it we canâ€™t be expecting the phone before at least Q4 in Europe,</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/01/10/apple-iphone-d-us-after-all%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Follow-up Web 2.0 running out of time?</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/01/03/first-follow-up-web-20-running-out-of-time/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/01/03/first-follow-up-web-20-running-out-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/01/03/first-follow-up-web-20-running-out-of-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I have already backtracked to my article Web 2.0 running out of time to where? a couple of times. Now a blog entry by ZDNet&#8217;s Steve O&#8217;Hear titled Could 2007 be the year of social network fatigue? was just Slashdotted. I recently mentioned ProfileLinker as one solution (ProfileLinker Simplifying Social Networking), but it also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I have already backtracked to my article <a title="Web 2.0 running out of time to where?" href="http://stepheno.net/2006/12/08/web-20-running-out-of-time-to-where/">Web 2.0 running out of time to where?</a> a couple of times. Now a blog entry by ZDNet&#8217;s Steve O&#8217;Hear titled <a title="ZDNet: Could 2007 be the year of social network fatigue?" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/social/?p=53">Could 2007 be the year of social network fatigue?</a> was just <a title="Social Network Fatigue Coming?" href="http://slashdot.org/articles/07/01/02/237223.shtml">Slashdotted</a>. </p>
<p><img id="image24" alt="Nancy19 Your Future Leader?" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2006/12/nancy19.jpg" /></p>
<p>I recently mentioned ProfileLinker as one solution (<a title="ProfileLinker Simplifying Social Networking" href="http://stepheno.net/2006/12/30/profilelinker-simplifying-social-networking/">ProfileLinker Simplifying Social Networking</a>), but it also seems, through O&#8217;Hear&#8217;s article and <a title="ZDNet: Do ordinary users care about data portability? And if not, should they? Four social networks respond." href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/social/?p=43">previous post</a>, that data portability from several networks is almost not present. (Also according to that post it must be noted that some networks do have the ability to export user data, ie. Flickr has an API for data export.) </p>
<p>However teen norms contradict a number of our expectations according to social networking sites, the opposing statement on the slashdot post also links to : Zephoria&#8217;s<a title="Zephoria: ephemeral profiles" href="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/01/01/ephemeral_profi.html">ephemeral profiles</a>. (Ephemeral &#8211; anything lasting but a day, or a brief time; an ephemeral plant, insect, etc. [1913 Webster]). So maybe starting anew, may be the solution for some, I don&#8217;t think it is a lasting solution. (Anoter related post of mine on networking teens, <a title="Nancy19 your future leader?" href="http://stepheno.net/2006/12/10/nancy19-your-future-leader/">Nancy19 Your Future Leader?</a>) Hence, it will definitely be interesting to follow these trends, and this is most likely only the first follow-up of more to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/01/03/first-follow-up-web-20-running-out-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laptops are NOT a Microsoft Bribe?</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/28/laptops-are-not-a-microsoft-bribe/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/28/laptops-are-not-a-microsoft-bribe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2006/12/28/laptops-are-not-a-microsoft-bribe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Microsoft&#8217;s so called bribing of profiled bloggers has flourished on the net the past day or so. (Wired&#8217;s: Microsoft Tries To Buy New Friends). Microsoft has apparently given laptops and mediacenters for free. Slashdot&#8217;s post linking to, amongst others, blogger Long Zheng. Well some of these &#8220;privileged&#8221; bloggers have felt the heat from critics. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Microsoft&#8217;s so called bribing of profiled bloggers has flourished on the net the past day or so. (Wired&#8217;s: <a title="Microsoft Tries to Buy New Friends" href="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2006/12/microsoft_tries_1.html">Microsoft Tries To Buy New Friends</a>). Microsoft has apparently given laptops and mediacenters for free. <a title="Slashdot: Microsoft Bribing Bloggers With Laptops" href="http://slashdot.org/articles/06/12/27/1423234.shtml">Slashdot&#8217;s post</a> linking to, amongst others, <a title="IStartedSomething: Microsoft Free Ferrari" href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20061227/microsoft-free-ferrari/">blogger Long Zheng</a>.</p>
<p>Well some of these &#8220;privileged&#8221; bloggers have felt the heat from critics. And I just read, most likely following this, <a title="Microsoft Wants Its Laptops Back" href="http://marshallk.com/microsoft-wants-its-laptops-back">Now Microsoft Wants Its Laptops Back</a>. According to the post, Microsoft is sending new emails to bloggers underlining that these PCs are intended strictly for review purposes: <em>&#8220;Just to make sure there is no misunderstanding of our intentions Iâ€™m going to ask that you either give the pc away or send it back when you no longer need it for product reviews.&#8221; &#8212; Microsoft rep.(?)</em></p>
<p><img alt="iStartedSomething Screenshot" id="image63" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2006/12/microsoftreview.jpg" /></p>
<p>Microsoft definitely needs some good reviews for Vista now, and this PR-scheme does show some good will. Microsoft&#8217;s Zune continues to struggle, and was among the &#8220;prized&#8221; in <a title="Wired's: 2006 Vapor awards." href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,72350-0.html?tw=wn_technology_8">Wired&#8217;s 2006 Vaporawards</a> as the &#8220;iPod killer&#8221;.<br />
Is Microsoft&#8217;s attempt to hook bloggers up with freebies an attempt of viral marketing? Should it rather be called <a title="Guerilla marketing" href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/2006/12/13">guerrilla marketing</a>? (spelling variation: gorilla).  Choose for yourself!</p>
<p>Edit: I must admit I am biased to Microsoft from beforehand, and that I think that this could work as a bribe. (Added questionmark to post title)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/28/laptops-are-not-a-microsoft-bribe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad and iTMS Movies &#8211; Apple Follow-Ups</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/21/ad-and-itms-movies-apple-follow-ups/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/21/ad-and-itms-movies-apple-follow-ups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTMS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2006/12/21/ad-and-itms-movies-apple-follow-ups/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple just updated their site with yet another Holiday Greeting (Hi-quality), in the spirit of the Get a Mac campaign and Christmas, this ad is about giving up their differences and enjoying the holiday. The previous ad from Apple for their iPod Shuffle came out a little over a month ago. I can&#8217;t say this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple just updated their <a title="Apple" href="http://www.apple.com">site</a> with yet another <a title="Holiday Greeting from Apple" href="http://www.apple.com/405/us/media/apple/getamac/goodwill_480x376.mov">Holiday Greeting</a> (<a title="Hi-quality Goodwill" href="http://www.apple.com/405/us/media/apple/getamac/goodwill_848x496.mov">Hi-quality</a>), in the spirit of the Get a Mac campaign and Christmas, this ad is about giving up their differences and enjoying the holiday. The previous ad from Apple for their <a title="New iPod Shuffle Ad" href="http://stepheno.net/2006/12/06/new-ipod-shuffle-ad/">iPod Shuffle</a> came out a little over a month ago. I can&#8217;t say this new Holiday Ad, is anywhere close in shear coolness factor to the iPod Shuffle <a title="iPod Shuffle ads" href="http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/ads/">Ad</a>, and compared to other Get A Mac ads, I.E. like <a title="Better Results" href="http://movies.apple.com/movies/us/apple/getamac/betterresults_480x376.mov">Better Results</a> with <a title="Giesele Bundchen" href="http://www.giselebundchen.com.br/gisele_home_1280.asp?ididioma=2">Gisele Bündchen&#8217;s</a> guest appearance.</p>
<p><img id="image54" alt="Mac Goodwill" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2006/12/macchristmas.jpg" /></p>
<p>My second follow-up is in regards to my post <a title="Domino effect for Apple's iTMS" href="http://stepheno.net/2006/12/07/domino-affect-for-apples-itms/">Domino effect for Apple&#8217;s iTMS?</a> where the hopes have not exactly been realized. But according to <a title="NPD Press Release Dec. 20 2006" href="http://www.npd.com/press/releases/press_061220.html">NPD&#8217;s Press Release</a> Apple&#8217;s iTunes Music Store (iTMS) led the market for paid digital video downloads. (With 90% of downloaded, paid videos.) Of the downloaded content: 62% were TV shows, 24% were music videos, and 6% were mainstream movie content. In my head that sums up to 92%, sounds like NPD failed to mention something. Well the number is 6! 6 percent mainstream movie downloads. It&#8217;s not much but it&#8217;s definitely as good start (especially for a Music Store.)</p>
<p>Via <a title="mac1.no" href="http://mac1.no">Mac1.no</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/21/ad-and-itms-movies-apple-follow-ups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.apple.com/405/us/media/apple/getamac/goodwill_480x376.mov" length="3620244" type="video/quicktime" />
<enclosure url="http://www.apple.com/405/us/media/apple/getamac/goodwill_848x496.mov" length="3288943" type="video/quicktime" />
<enclosure url="http://movies.apple.com/movies/us/apple/getamac/betterresults_480x376.mov" length="3728816" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logo of Letters. KISS or NOT?</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/20/design-before-and-after-kiss-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/20/design-before-and-after-kiss-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 19:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2006/12/20/design-before-and-after-kiss-or-not/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bamag.com has a nice and simple guide (PDF) on how to make some simple logoâ€™s by joining letters together. During the past years I have designed an odd number of logoâ€™s, and have learned that the simpler and less complex the more popular they have become. All the examples in the guide(http://www.bamag.com/email/0-by967od3-email/7ecHEs/BA0363LogoOfLetters.pdf), I believe follow the KISS rule. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Before and After Magazine" href="http://www.bamag.com">Bamag.com</a> has a nice and <a title="Logo of Letters PDF" href="http://www.bamag.com/email/0-by967od3-email/7ecHEs/BA0363LogoOfLetters.pdf">simple guide</a> (PDF) on how to make some simple logoâ€™s by joining letters together. During the past years I have designed an odd number of logoâ€™s, and have learned that the simpler and less complex the more popular they have become. All the examples in the guide(<a href="http://www.bamag.com/email/0-by967od3-email/7ecHEs/BA0363LogoOfLetters.pdf">http://www.bamag.com/email/0-by967od3-email/7ecHEs/BA0363LogoOfLetters.pdf</a>), I believe follow the KISS rule. (Keep It Simple Stupid, or Keep It Sweet Simple, depending on who your teacher taught you, or how direct you want to be.)</p>
<p><img id="image52" alt="Before and After - Designing a Logo of Letters" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2006/12/logodesign.jpg" /></p>
<p>Or NOT kiss? <a title="Slashdot" href="http://slashdot.org">Slashdot</a> posted that <a title="Simplicity is Out" href="http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/12/1430212">Simplicity is Out</a> last week. <a title="Simplicity is Highly Overrated" href="http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/simplicity_is_highly.html">Norman</a> and <a title="Spolsky on complex software" href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/12/09.html">Spolsky</a> are behind this new trend in the making. As my own experiences canâ€™t match theirs, I am going to step carefully around this matter. I am most eager to see what actual studies&#8217; results may show on the subject, before going even more complex, (selling out to complexity), going deeper than I may already be, in lack of intentionally keeping it KISS. On the other hand I will disagree, but respectfully, to <a title="The Truth about Google's so-called simplicity" href="http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/the_truth_about.html">another essay</a> by Norman where he argues that Google is not that simple, and the more complex MSN and Yahoo is easier. My personal experience, after using Yahoo for the past decade, and although I do still cherish Yahoo, I feel that their complexity is among reasons why Google became more popular.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/20/design-before-and-after-kiss-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone is Not Apple&#8217;s iPhone</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/18/iphone-is-not-apples-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/18/iphone-is-not-apples-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2006/12/18/iphone-is-not-apples-iphone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So today the iPhone was officially announced, not quite what a lot of people had expected (My previous Apple and iPhone post). Quite fairly Linksys, owned by Cisco who acquired a company that had apparently registered the trademark iPhone in the nineties, is behind the real iPhone. This iPhone might have come as a rather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So today the iPhone was officially <a title="MacScoop" href="http://www.macscoop.com/articles/2006/12/18/the-iphone-officially-announced-by-linksys">announced</a>, not quite what a lot of people had expected (My previous <a title="Hoping Apple doesn't iPhone" href="http://stepheno.net/2006/12/08/i-hope-apple-doesnt-iphone/">Apple and iPhone</a> post).<br />
Quite fairly <a title="LinkSys" href="http://www.linksys.com/">Linksys</a>, owned by <a title="Cisco Systems Inc." href="http://www.cisco.com/">Cisco</a> who acquired a company that had apparently <a title="iPhone story at Businessweek" href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2006/tc20061218_465203.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_today%27s+top+stories">registered</a> the trademark iPhone in the nineties, is behind the real iPhone. This iPhone might have come as a rather disappointing surprise for many of you, as there is something about Apple&#8217;s design and prestige that other companies struggle to achieve. Personally I was more humorously amused, in addition it makes me wonder what will the consumers be expecting from Apple now?<br />
<img id="image48" alt="Linksys' iPhone" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2006/12/linksysiphone.jpg" /></p>
<p>Before appearing negative to Linksys&#8217; <a title="Linksys' iPhone" href="http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Satellite?c=L_Promotion_C1&#038;childpagename=US%2FLayout&#038;cid=1165633244027&#038;pagename=Linksys%2FCommon%2FVisitorWrapper">iPhone</a>, I must admit it actually in a way seems a little cool, except for selling out their VOIP&#8217;ing integration to Skype. Linksys&#8217; iPhone family consists of Cordless Internet Telephones, that require a computer interface, and Wireless Internet Phones (WIP), that allow calls over accessible WiFi networks. The WIP phones are the ones that are more interesting, which allow you to view web content. In addition their top-model WIP330 runs Windows Mobile OS, and supports multimedia. However this is not very different from <a title="WiFi phones make a splash" href="http://news.com.com/Wi-Fi+phones+make+a+splash/2100-7351_3-5296745.html">several phones</a> on the market today, that offer WiFi options as well support for regular cell carriers.<br />
On the down side there is no initial support for emergency calls. And you are still dependent  on Wi-Fi coverage, something thats not necessarily always a free service yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/18/iphone-is-not-apples-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nancy19 Your Future Leader?</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/10/nancy19-your-future-leader/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/10/nancy19-your-future-leader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2006/12/10/nancy19-your-future-leader/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to one study, the typical person who participates in online communities, i.e. Nancy19, is your future leader. Characterisitics of people who participate in online communities are: *Fast followers *More flexible *Open communicators *Aspire to greatness *Looking for new, innovative ideas They sum those characters up: In short &#8211; your future leaders. (According to Attention [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to one study, the typical person who participates in online communities, i.e. Nancy19, is your future leader.<br />
<img id="image24" alt="Nancy19 Your Future Leader?" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2006/12/nancy19.jpg" /><br />
<a title="Are you out there?" href="http://www.webmetricsguru.com/2006/12/are_you_out_there.html">Characterisitics</a> of people who participate in online communities are:<br />
*Fast followers<br />
*More flexible<br />
*Open communicators<br />
*Aspire to greatness<br />
*Looking for new, innovative ideas<br />
They sum those characters up: In short &#8211; your future leaders.</p>
<p>(According to <a title="Attention Company" href="http://www.attnco.com/outthere/Out%20There%20Presentation.pdf">Attention Company</a>, responsbile for the study)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2006/12/10/nancy19-your-future-leader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
