<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>stepheno.net &#187; Camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stepheno.net/category/camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stepheno.net</link>
	<description>Captivating communication confusion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some good 2008 videos</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2008/12/30/some-good-2008-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2008/12/30/some-good-2008-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motiongraphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/?p=1246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are a couple of videos I enjoyed during the last months. Innovation is probably one of their common factors. Toshiba Timesculpture Advert [YouTube] If A Song Could Get Me You [YouTube] &#8211; Marit Larsen [MySpace] One of the first &#8230; <a href="http://stepheno.net/2008/12/30/some-good-2008-videos/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><br /><p>Here are a couple of videos I enjoyed during the last months. Innovation is probably one of their common factors.</p>
<p><a title="YouTube: Toshiba Ad" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYPn1BrTNCE&amp;fmt=18">Toshiba Timesculpture Advert</a> [YouTube]<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1247" title="Screenshot from YouTube - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYPn1BrTNCE&amp;fmt=18" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/youtubetoshiba.jpg" alt="" width="440" height="247" /></p>
<p><a title="YouTube: Marit Larsen - If A Song Could Get Me You" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcjzRuFkJP4&amp;fmt=18">If A Song Could Get Me You</a> [YouTube] &#8211; <a title="MySpace: Marit Larsen" href="http://myspace.com/maritlarsen" target="_blank">Marit Larsen</a> [MySpace]<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1248" title="Screenshot from YouTube - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcjzRuFkJP4&amp;fmt=18" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/youtubemarit.jpg" alt="" width="440" height="311" /></p>
<p>One of the first videos shot with the MK5ii. By Vincent Laforet and his team.<br />
<a title="Vincent Laforet - Reverie" href="http://blog.vincentlaforet.com/2008/10/10/without-further-ado-reverie/">Riverie</a> [Vincent Laforet blog]<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1250" title="Screenshot Vincent Laforet\'s Blog" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/vincentlaforet.jpg" alt="" width="440" height="255" /></p>
<p><a title="YouTube: United State of Pop 2008 (Viva La Pop)" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLaZ-8IMtt0&amp;fmt=18">2008 Pop-songs in single mix</a> [YouTube] &#8211; <a title="djearworm: united state of pop 2008" href="http://djearworm.com/united-state-of-pop-2008.htm">United State of Pop 2008 &#8211; djearworm<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1264" title="Screenshot YouTube clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLaZ-8IMtt0" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/youtubepop.jpg" alt="" width="440" height="247" /></a><br />
(Via <a title="Lifehacker . 2008s top 25 pop songs in one mashup" href="http://lifehacker.com/5120140/hear-2008s-top-25-pop-songs-in-one-mashup">Lifehacker</a>)</p>
<p><a title="YouTube: 2008 in two minutes" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzNUrZbalss&amp;fmt=18">A Year in Two Minutes</a> [YouTube] &#8211; <a title="Eirik Solheim's Blog" href="http://eirkso.com">Eirik Solheim</a><br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1249" title="Screenshot : Eirik Solheim A year in two minutes copied from http://nrkbeta.no" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/eiriksoscreenshot.jpg" alt="" width="440" height="275" /><br />
Link: <a title="Eirik Solheim's : A year in 40 seconds" href="http://eirikso.com/2008/12/27/one-year-worth-of-images-give-some-amazing-videos/">Eirikso.com</a> Photo/screenshot: Eirik Solheim (Also check out<a title="Vimeo: A year in 40 seconds" href="http://vimeo.com/2639782"> A year in 40 seconds</a> [Vimeo])</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2008/12/30/some-good-2008-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cameras-phones vs. Digital Consumer-Cameras</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/04/30/cameras-phones-vs-digital-consumer-cameras/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/04/30/cameras-phones-vs-digital-consumer-cameras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/04/30/cameras-phones-vs-digital-consumer-cameras/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally I read about the review comparing some camera-phones to consumer digital cameras at Slashdot which the UK branch of CNET has titled: Camera combat. The review has already caused some debate, and the question still remains whether camera phones &#8230; <a href="http://stepheno.net/2007/04/30/cameras-phones-vs-digital-consumer-cameras/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><br /><p>Originally I read about the review comparing some camera-phones to consumer digital cameras at <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/25/0114228" title="Ssashdot: Digital cameras vs. cameraphone">Slashdot</a> which the UK branch of CNET has titled: <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/0,39029453,49289927,00.htm" title="CNET UK: Camera Combat">Camera combat</a>. The review has already caused some debate, and the question still remains whether camera phones could replace standalone cameras.</p>
<p><img src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/04/celldslrcamera.jpg" alt="CNet.co.uk Camera Phone Review Screenshot" /></p>
<p>The results do definitely make you wonder.<br />
In my opinion it depends on how you will use the camera. Here is a pro-camera phone example: Capturing the moment while you are out and about. I believe that the accessibility of camera phone would surpass the extra burden of having to always remember to bring another camera with you.<br />
Although if you are interested in quality or do have in mind of printing pictures you take, you should invest in some better optics that are not squeezed to fit inside an already slim phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/04/30/cameras-phones-vs-digital-consumer-cameras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Rules Raw  Recording</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/03/14/red-rules-raw-recording/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/03/14/red-rules-raw-recording/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/03/14/red-rules-raw-recording/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The camera that many have commented looks like some kind of cool futuristic weapon. Its cool design is not very surprising, considering the camera is being developed by Jim Jannard, the founder of Oakley (Source: HD Cinema Group). RED dubs &#8230; <a href="http://stepheno.net/2007/03/14/red-rules-raw-recording/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><br /><p>The camera that many have commented looks like some kind of cool futuristic weapon. Its cool design is not very surprising, considering the camera is being developed by Jim Jannard, the founder of Oakley (Source: <a title="HD Cinema Group" href="http://www.hdcinemagroup.com/red/">HD Cinema Group</a>).</p>
<p><img id="image274" alt="Screenshot  Red ONE Camera Package" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/03/redcampack.jpg" /></p>
<p>RED dubs its RED ONE camera UHD, Ultra High Definition, a fair title with its whopping 12 Megapixels. Red can record up to 60 fps in RAW or 2 x over-sampled HD in 4:4:4 or 4:2:2. The camera was announced almost a year ago (Ref. Gizmodo), but <a title="Red" href="http://red.com/">RED</a> has only recently gone public with <a title="Red One Pricing" href="http://red.com/pricelist.htm">pricing</a>.</p>
<p><img id="image275" alt="Screenshot  Red ONE Camera  Body" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/03/redcambody.jpg" /></p>
<p>The actual body is cheap (picture above), only $17,500, however it&#8217;s useless without pricy accessories. <a title="HD4Indies RED ONE pricing" href="http://www.hdforindies.com/2007/03/red-one-accessory-pricing-announced.html">HD4Indies</a> has more on pricing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/03/14/red-rules-raw-recording/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Printable Foldable Lense Hood</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/03/06/printable-foldable-lense-hood/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/03/06/printable-foldable-lense-hood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/03/06/printable-foldable-lense-hood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These printable and foldable lens hoods (Free, Foldable Lens Hood) have been circulating the net for the past couple days. I have been skeptical, but when Photojojo chose to run the story, I thought I would give them a try &#8230; <a href="http://stepheno.net/2007/03/06/printable-foldable-lense-hood/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><br /><p>These printable and foldable lens hoods (<a title="Free Foldable Lens Hoods" href="http://www.lenshoods.co.uk/">Free, Foldable Lens Hood</a>) have been circulating the net for the past couple days. I have been skeptical, but when <a title="PhotoJojo: Foldable Lens Hood" href="http://www.photojojo.com/content/diy/make-your-own-lens-hood/">Photojojo</a> chose to run the story, I thought I would give them a try after all.</p>
<p><img id="image250" alt="Screenshot Lenshoods.co.uk" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/03/pdflensehood.jpg" /></p>
<p>Now I believe that a lens hoods feature is to help block sun rays from causing lense flare or glare. (More about Lens hoods at <a title="WikiPedia: Lens Hoods" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_hood">Wikipedia</a>). So these printable lens hoods should serve there purpose the question is how effective, if at all, this would be. The instructions suggest you attach it to your camera with an elastic band. I still have to find some scissors and try it on one of my lenses.</p>
<p>From a shallow point of view, I wonder how serious people would take a photographer who arrives with a bunch of paper attached to a lens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/03/06/printable-foldable-lense-hood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon Powershot Now With HD?</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/02/22/canon-powershot-now-with-hd/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/02/22/canon-powershot-now-with-hd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/02/22/canon-powershot-now-with-hd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canon launches a new consumer mini-HD-camcorder: Powershot TX1. Following their Powershot line from the digital still-cameras this camera features 7.1 megapixel for still shots and 720p HD footage. The HD capabilities are still very mediocre, comparable to that of Panasonics (My mention: &#8230; <a href="http://stepheno.net/2007/02/22/canon-powershot-now-with-hd/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><br /><p>Canon launches a new consumer mini-HD-camcorder: Powershot TX1. Following their Powershot line from the digital still-cameras this camera features 7.1 megapixel for still shots and 720p HD footage.<br />
The HD capabilities are still very mediocre, comparable to that of Panasonics (My mention: <a title="Consumer HD(V)-Camcocrder?) " href="http://stepheno.net/2007/02/08/consumer-hdv-camcocrder/">Consumer HD(V)-Camcocrder?)</a> and Sanyo (<a title="Engadget: Sanyo 7mpx hd camcorder" href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/08/sanyos-xacti-hd2-high-def-camcorder-delivers-7-megapixel-stills/">Engadget review</a>). An advantage with Canon&#8217;s is that it has an optical-stabilized lense, something that at least Sanyo&#8217;s is missing.</p>
<p><img id="image214" alt="Canon Powershot TX1 - Picture from DPReview.com" src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/02/canonpshothd1.jpg" /><br />
Picture copied from dpreview.com</p>
<p>If you want to call it a limitation or not, the 4GB SD card will give you 13 minutes of 1280&#215;720 resolution (at 30fps).<br />
For a more indeapth review checkout the review over at <a title="DPReview: Canon Powershot w/HD" href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0702/07022203canontx1.asp">Digital Photography Review</a>.</p>
<p>(Via <a title="Engadget: Canon Powershot w/HD" href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/21/canons-compact-tx1-captures-7-1-megapixel-stills-and-hd-video">Engadget</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/02/22/canon-powershot-now-with-hd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer HD(V)-Camcocrder?</title>
		<link>http://stepheno.net/2007/02/08/consumer-hdv-camcocrder/</link>
		<comments>http://stepheno.net/2007/02/08/consumer-hdv-camcocrder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stephen olsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stepheno.net/2007/02/08/consumer-hdv-camcocrder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canon HV20 a $1100 HDV camcorder reviewed t hdvinfo.net. Some of its nifty features include: HDMI, 4-channel audio and 10x HD Lens w/ Super Range Optical Image Stabilisation. Canon&#8217;s 2.96 megapixel 1/3-inch CMOS sensor provides native 1920&#215;1080 resolution. Also found &#8230; <a href="http://stepheno.net/2007/02/08/consumer-hdv-camcocrder/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><br /><p>Canon HV20 a $1100 HDV camcorder <a title="HDV20 Overview" href="http://www.hdvinfo.net/articles/canon/hv20overview.php">reviewed t hdvinfo.net</a>. Some of its nifty features include: HDMI, 4-channel audio and 10x HD Lens w/ Super Range Optical Image Stabilisation. Canon&#8217;s 2.96 megapixel 1/3-inch CMOS sensor provides native 1920&#215;1080 resolution.</p>
<p><img id="image179" alt="Canon HV20 Picture from akam.no " src="http://stepheno.net/wpso/wp-content/2007/02/canonhv20.jpg" /></p>
<p>Also found some lines written on the HV20 over at <a title="HD for Indies: hv20" href="http://www.hdforindies.com/2007/02/canon-hv20-as-crash-cam.html">HD for Indies</a>. And yes it will really boil down to what you need it for, with this 1/3 inch sensor you can&#8217;t have anything close to the quality of its big brothers, hence note the word consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stepheno.net/2007/02/08/consumer-hdv-camcocrder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

